gaza and gay crying peoples

To have a country broken down into rubble was what made Mehmed in turkey cry. for that country was once great. sultan quite gay
now, the gaza people have no sultan to cry. so they make malaysians, indonesians and all muslim countries cry for them. perhaps we will cry, perhaps we will not.
those who do not cry, have this incredible faith in israel, why would one have faith in israel? is it because god's people leave there? the elohim, the yahweh has blessed them?
or is it because we have been brainwashed by the american propaganda that israel is blameless and can do no harm.

why would one question proportionality?
is that not the UN's way in paying lip service in somewhat turning a blind eye to wars that will inevitably occur? is that their manner to show that they do no condone any course of action that could potentially lead to the obliterating of one state? the question is is it even a practical concept?
in the practicality of it all....... isn't proportionality merely the UN protecting not those of weak soldiers and little resources but rather, weak minded? proportionality will always be in retaliation.
so isn't this vague theory just a way to protect the weak morons who decide to pick a fight with a giant that they soon realize they cannot possibly overthrow them. proportionality. heresy to any concept of war. tell the warmongerers of proportionality.
you'll be their breakfast. it is not that i condone sufferings of many... but the greatest of countries have fought the bloodiest of wars.

and the chickenshit countries have their kings run away to a place where there are many lizards and biawak when the enemy strikes. so in my opinion, yeah, great countries are based on bloodshed, regardless of wars won or lost . and countries that have fought wars like pansies soon show that only pansies live there.
proportionality? vague, fake, and hyped up concept that the un just came up with for people to think that they are doin their job. kesian them also right.

did the palestine truly deserve to burn to the ground?
accumulative punishment, some people say, they had it coming. if one would elect the hamas in 2006, branded terrorists by of course the very people that know exactly what terrorists look like eg: US, Israel and the EU (antichrist), so one would expect inevitable burning of the city run by them terrorists.
but what if hamas represented a hope to be liberated from western culture, from people attempting to impose their economic and social standards on people who are better defined by their culture and tribal sects? eg: how the vietnamese responded to viet cong?
would you say that a nation led by freedom fighters would deserve to be burnt to the ground?

but now people return to find their homes in rubble.
no people deserves that. perhaps we should at least cry for them a wee bit.
since they do not have sultan mehmed to cry for them. is it mehmed? dunno....

what about israel?
dunno.....
the un is quite gay.
the eu is quite gay.
gay antichrist...